That looks neat! Everyone, what do you think?
..m On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 5:57 AM James Browning via devel <devel@ntpsec.org> wrote: > > I have set up a branch replacing the current Python version-specific > ntp.ntpc with a language-agnostic foreign function interface stub point > and a version agnostic Python ntp.ntpc using cytpes. > > On build, it produces a single shared library 'libntp.so' in the ntpd > sub^n-directory and a now neat Python module in the adjacent pylib > directory. > > The intention is to speed up the compilation of multiple version of the > Python module. The current implementation requires recompilation of the > entire tree. I think soon that a reasonable meta-build system could > build the tree once, install and then link in new Python versions as > desired. Also, it would allow for the authoring of third party non- > Python clients. > > At this point, I am looking for constructive criticism. I am posting this > here because I feel this would be impactful and non-trivial. I must admit > I am unaware of the impactfulness of my submissions. > > tdr; merge request -> https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/merge_requests/1010 > > branch -> https://gitlab.com/jamesb_fe80/ntpsec/tree/ctype > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@ntpsec.org > http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Mark Atwood <mark.atw...@ntpsec.org> Project Manager, https://NTPsec.org +1-206-604-2198 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
