> Wouldn't it be simpler to ude a base image in the CI that isn't buggy?
Maybe. I don't know that area. If that is the only place we test seccomp, then yes, we should switch to Fedora or Debian. If that is testing if we can build on Alpine, then it has found a bug but the bug is in Alpine rather than our code. We could maybe backup to an older version of Alpine, but I think it would be better to test their latest/current version and document that seccomp doesn't work there. I'm working on a hack fix. For the record, here is diff between Fedora and Alpine: [murray@hgm ~]$ diff seccomp-syscalls.h-fedora seccomp-syscalls.h-alpine 275d274 < #define __PNR_ppoll -10241 1361,1366d1359 < #endif < < #ifdef __NR_ppoll < #define __SNR_ppoll __NR_ppoll < #else < #define __SNR_ppoll __PNR_ppoll [murray@hgm ~]$ -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
