Richard Laager via devel <devel@ntpsec.org>: > On 7/5/21 8:38 AM, Eric S. Raymond via devel wrote: > > > There is a close-to-RFC to handle this area. "Interleave" is the > > > buzzword. I > > > haven't studied it. The idea is to grab a transmit time stamp, then > > > tweak the > > > protocol a bit so you can send that on the next packet. > > > Daniel discovered it was broken and removed it from the protcol machine. > > Broken implementation or broken design? If the latter, is the current IETF > proposal (wherever that is) still broken?
You'll have to ask Daniel that. I've dforgotten the details and never saw the IETF proposal you speak of. -- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a> _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel