Mike Christie wrote: > James Smart wrote >>> struct fc_rport * >>> fc_remote_port_add(struct Scsi_Host *shost, int channel, >>> - struct fc_rport_identifiers *ids) >>> + struct fc_rport *rogue_rport, >>> + struct fc_rport_identifiers *ids) >> ... rest of fc_remote_port_add changes. >> >> I like how much code you cleaned up by replacing the per-list search >> paths, but it's thrown me. Proceed with what's there, and I'll post a > > I did not know what, "It's thrown me" meant? Did you mean you do not > have enough time to fully review it? And then does proceed with what's > there mean mean use the original code?
just I've run out of time for today to look at it. Proceed means - go with your patch, but I would like my prior comments addressed if you agree with them. -- james s _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
