Robert, Seems the p2p mode between initiator and sw target is broken for the re-architecture code, I likely to know how do you guys test the initiator when you do the re-arch? Does it have to go thru a fcgw or a real switch fabric? Is there other easy way that I can get this set up with a connection like before? Thanks again for your help.
charles -----Original Message----- From: Robert Love [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 6:20 PM To: charles zhuang Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Open-FCoE] Setup question On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 16:26 -0500, charles zhuang wrote: <snip> > > Also, on the initiator, I don't have openfc.ko, I only have fcoe.ko, > libfc.ko, scsi_transport_fc.ko, and scsi_mod.ko. Did I miss anything? > > 2. By following the quick start on initiator, my initiator system > doesn't have fcconf. I guess I can use the same procedure on the target > quick start guide to build/install fcconf and hbaapi. I don't need > openfctgt and scst. Is it correct? > fcconf was our user application before our re-architecture (the process that converted openfc.ko to libfc.ko). We had to remove fcconf because it was getting information from the kernel in the wrong way. We've made a small application fcoeadm that will create/destroy and soon we'll be adding code to report information like what fcconf did. git clone git://open-fcoe.org/openfc/open-fcoe.git You will need to use fcconf for the target because the target is based on our pre-architecture. Unfortunately my guess is that point-to-point mode is broken for the re-architecture code (the initiator), but I don't know for sure. It's been untested for some time. > Thanks very much for your help. > > charles > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
