Robert Love wrote: > On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 16:56 -0700, Vasu Dev wrote: >> On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 13:28 -0700, Robert Love wrote: >>> I'm encountering a BUG in our -features tree. I'm not sure why my >>> pre-posting testing didn't catch it and I don't know the root-cause >>> yet as I just started investigating. >>> >>> It happens immediately when attempting to 'create' an interface >>> which has a link to a non-FIP FCF. >> >> The latest fcoe-feature tree works for me with non-FIP FCF for basic >> testing, my each basic testing had some bs=512 bytes read and write >> working after create interface and then unloading stack. >> >> I had problem in pulling latest fcoe-feature tree, the git-pull >> failed with merge conflict errors. The pull failed due to merging >> this fix from Joe >> http://www.open-fcoe.org/pipermail/devel/2009-March/002046.html to >> existing fcoe cpu hotplug patches on tip. I reset my tree skipping >> all cpu hotplug patches and then pulled again to get-pull working on >> fcoe-feature again and same would be required for any pre-existing >> fcoe-feature unless they do fresh clone of fcoe-feature. >> >> how frequent you see this BUG ? If it happens on every create then >> very strange since I don't see same in my setup for several my BAT >> running. >> > > I'm seeing this every time I try to create an interface and I'm pretty > baffled as to why. I just finished the following- > > 1) clone scsi-misc > > 2) rebase to Linus' tip > > 3) apply 14 fcoe patches from linux-scsi > > 4) test > > 5) *boom* > > I'll push an updated -feature tree based on scsi-misc + patches > straight from the linux-scsi mailing list so you guys can try it. I'm > also going to diff patches from linux-scsi vs. patches on -features
I don't see any code differences, just a commit msg or two that I updated. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
