On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 08:14 -0700, Vasu Dev wrote:
> This is required for sharing offload xid range across multiple
> lport on a eth device on demand using unused exch_get interface
I meant on demand "xid allocation" using unused exch_get..
> of the libfc, the first patch in the series describes more
> details on this.
> 2. make sure these are for right fcoe tree, this series is basically
> fixing an issue due to two xid range use within a EM of lport,
> so should be applicable to fcoe-fixes tree but if you think this
> should be queue for fcoe-features then let me know and I'll rediff
> these patches fcoe-features tree. In that case what will be the
> order with other pending or new features to avoid merging issues.
>
Rob,
Can you please address this comment, so in case this series needs to
updated for fcoe-featutres tree then I can do that before next patch
submit.
Vasu
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
