From: Robert Love <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:48:03 -0700
> Yes, absolutely, but it's only this small patch that creates the > dependency. I figured that all of the other fcoe patches could go into > James' scsi-misc tree and get merged first. Then this one could go into > his scsi-post-merge tree and depend on net-next. > > It's really up to you and James, I just thought that would be easier. So I tried to apply just the networking bits but none of the ixgbe parts apply properly to net-next-2.6, so this patch series will need to be respun and resubmitted in it's entirety so I can apply it properly. It seems that the ixgbe driver now maintains feature flags differently than whatever revision of the driver these patches were generated against. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
