On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 18:14 -0700, Robert Love wrote: > Hello, > > I rebased fcoe-next.git to be Linus' tree + scsi-rc-fixes + scsi-misc > so that we're as close to the tip of development as possible for the > next merge window and so that we have as many upstream fixes as > possible. The repository is now up to -rc4. You will need to rebase your > trees as a result. > > I made two feature removals (3 patches) from our set. Chris found a > problem with CRC calculations in one of the FC Passthrough patches that > was setting up a common copy_to_buffer function, so I removed the FC > Passthrough patches from the series. I also didn't like the name of the
This FC Passthrough removal has caused fcoe-utils.git to fail to build since these patches were exporting FC kernel header files needed by fcping in fcoe-utils.git. I'm going to try and fix this quickly by extracting the FC header exporting into it's own patch. It should be a trivial patch. I will check this patch in immediately to correct the fcoe-utils.git build errors. Normally I want to have patches on the list for a few days before committing, to get review, but I think it's worse to have fcoe-utils.git broken. Also, I can't imagine that there would be feedback to the exporting of these header files. If there is then I can pop the patch, make a fix and rebase fcoe-next.git. Regarding the common copy routine- I'm making some improvements to it and they'll need some testing before I can post them (at least finalized). One potential change would be to move the common function to a common utility file for libfc. Right now that common routine is in fc_fcp.c, but it's used by fc_lport.c too. I'll probably create a fc_libfc.c file for common routines. //Rob _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
