Vasu Dev wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 20:54 +0200, Christof Schmitt wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 04:08:24PM -0700, Vasu Dev wrote:
>>> -v3
>>> Moves max_queue_depth initialization after slave_configure is
>>> called from after slave_alloc calling done. Also adjusted
>>> max_queue_depth check to skip ramp up if current queue_depth
>>> is >= max_queue_depth.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vasu Dev <[email protected]>
>> Looks good to me. I ran some tests on s390 and the queue depth counter
>> increased until hitting the defined maximum.
>>
>
> Good.
>
>>> @@ -779,6 +781,36 @@ static struct device_attribute
>>> sdev_attr_queue_depth_rw =
>>> sdev_store_queue_depth_rw);
>>>
>>> static ssize_t
>>> +sdev_show_queue_ramp_up_period(struct device *dev,
>>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>>> + char *buf)
>>> +{
>>> + struct scsi_device *sdev;
>>> + sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
>>> + return snprintf(buf, 20, "%lu\n", sdev->queue_ramp_up_period);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static ssize_t
>>> +sdev_store_queue_ramp_up_period(struct device *dev,
>>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>>> + const char *buf, size_t count)
>>> +{
>>> + struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
>>> + unsigned long period;
>>> +
>>> + if (strict_strtoul(buf, 10, &period))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + sdev->queue_ramp_up_period = period;
>>> + return period;
>>> +}
>> [...]
>>> + unsigned long queue_ramp_up_period; /* ramp up period in jiffies */
>>> +#define SCSI_DEFAULT_RAMP_UP_PERIOD (120 * HZ)
>> Only a small inconvenience i guess: The sysfs attribute shows the
>> ramp-up-period in jiffies. On my system with HZ==100 the default is
>> 12000 and i was wondering if this would be milliseconds or something
>> related. If HZ changes, the unit of the ramp-up-period also changes.
>>
>> I would prefer having seconds or milliseconds in sysfs and only using
>> jiffies internally.
>>
>
> Added timestamp comparison checks are straightforward without any
> additional conversion on each check since added timestamps and
> queue_ramp_up_period both are jiffies, so works better this way with
> stored queue_ramp_up_period in jiffies.
>
> I do see your point as well but jiffies unit is also common in Linux.
> However if you or some other feels strongly to change this to ms or
> seconds unit then I could change store or show sysfs functions to handle
> this value in ms or second unit while storing it in jiffies in
> queue_ramp_up_period.
>
> Vasu
I agree with Christof on this, HZ may be 100 on some machines and 1000
on others. Management tools (if they ever adjust this) would like
standard units, so it should be in ms or seconds, and I prefer ms.
I would just change the sysfs functions as you say, and use jiffies internally.
Joe
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
