Sir,
I tried settip up intiitor and target on *real machines*
initiator on fedora 8 *2.6.32.3
*target on fedora 8 *2.6.23.1*
target started using fcconf on eth0: FLOGIs
inititor started on eth0 : FIP solicitation then FLOGIs
gets a few replies then
kernel dump at target
i have attached the error log in terminal*(err_log.txt)*,
dmesg output *(syslog.txt)*
and the wireshark trace taken at the target*([email protected])*
In the quickstart , it says the target shud be started first and then the
initiator for this issue
but i have done the same still the error?
i have pause enabled only at target . the initiator machine doesn't support
pause
is this what causing the problem?
thanks
-vinvishwa
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 2:31 PM, vinvishwa <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sir,
> is there any way we can start the target without setting the pause
> parameters?
> my nic doesn't support pause (autonegotiation,rx tx is not supported)
> if i try starting the target without setting pause
> the following error:
> fcconf: fcc_fcoe_config: FCoE create of eth0 failed
> fcconf: fcc_fcoe_config: error 95 (null)
> fcconf: fcc_fcoe_config: exiting at fcc_fcoe.c:142
>
> I tried commenting the code in *fcoe_if.c*
> whcih checks for pause
> but it returns a *segmentation fault.*
> and the system hangs (so cant send you the syslog)
> thank you,
> -vinvishwa
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:03 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Vishwa,
>>
>> We can help you more if you can help us with the full spec of the setup
>> that you are using.
>>
>> -Steeve
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>> On Behalf Of Joe Eykholt
>> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:32 PM
>> To: vinvishwa
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Open-FCoE] Help with FCoE login process
>>
>> vinvishwa wrote:
>> > hi Sir
>> > sorry to disturb you once again
>> >
>> > As it implies from the previous discussions that configurations in
>> > virtual environment(Sun Virtual Box) seems clumsy and unreal ,
>> >
>> > I tried to switch to real hardware
>> > wanted to get some issues answered
>> >
>> > * I do not have a server architecture nor a scsi disk ; *so will
>> > normal SATA disk work as target disk?*
>>
>> Yes. SCST even has a way of using a regular file as a target LUN.
>>
>> > * Also i have set up FCoE target on Fedora 8 and then added the
>> > target disk, but *fcconf returns* error as pause settings are
>> not
>> > enabled
>> >
>> > o linux-ihct:/home/pxe123 # ethtool -A eth0 tx on rx on
>> > Cannot get device pause settings: *Operation not
>> supported*
>> > o *linux-g557:/ # ethtool -a eth0*
>> > Pause parameters for eth0:
>> > Cannot get device pause settings: Operation not supported
>>
>> You need a different Ethernet device, one that supports pause.
>> I would think most 1 gig or 10G NICs support pause.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> >
>> > Please help me with this.
>> > Thank you,
>> > -vinvishwa
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Joe Eykholt <[email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >
>> > vinvishwa wrote:
>> >
>> > Have you tried putting both sides in promiscuous mode?
>> >
>> >
>> > No I didn't (as i didn't know how to)
>> > But I will surely do this
>> >
>> > I looked at the traces. showed FLOGIs
>> > from both sides but no accepts from either. I can't
>> explain
>> > that.
>> > The other trace showed FLOGIs only from the initiator,
>> nothing
>> > received from the target. Why the difference? Was the
>> wireshark
>> > done on the target side? Wireshark will go promiscuous, so
>> maybe
>> > that's the difference.
>> >
>> >
>> > The trace
>> > fcoe_pcap_100110.pcap is from Wireshark running on host
>> > m/c(windows XP.)
>> >
>> > (the target and initiator are VMs in Sun Virtual box and both
>> > are using bridged network)
>> >
>> > and the 2nd trace named file was taken at the *initiator side
>> > *with the tcpdump cmd
>> > tcpdump -p -i ethX -w /tmp/file -s 0
>> > *Does that mean that the inititor did not receive any of the
>> > FLOGIs sent by the target?*
>> > (but both the initiator and target m/cs can ping each other)
>> >
>> >
>> > One problem is that the unicast address used by the FLOGI doesn't
>> > work on switches, it's really meant to be point-to point (no
>> switch).
>> > The FLOGI is sent to MAC 0e:fc:00:ff:ff:fe, a unicast address.
>> > The switch should flood that to all ports since it doesn't know
>> > the address. The virtual switch may not do that since it "thinks"
>> > it knows all the MAC addresses on the guests. That would explain
>> > why none of the ports receive the FLOGI.
>> >
>> > If there was a way to directly connect the NICs of the two guests,
>> > that would be nice, but there probably isn't since this is such
>> > a special case.
>> >
>> > I will do the steps suggested by you and will send it to you
>> >
>> > Thank you really very much
>> > -vinvishwa
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Joe Eykholt
>> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Joe Eykholt wrote:
>> >
>> > vinvishwa wrote:
>> >
>> > hello Sir,
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Joe Eykholt
>> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> > <mailto:[email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote:
>> >
>> > vinvishwa wrote:
>> >
>> > Thank you sir for replying
>> > It made many things clear and also the
>> problem
>> > with my
>> > configuration.
>> >
>> > but the issue with my configuration still
>> remains
>> > unsolved.
>> >
>> > and you said its currently broken
>> > so is there any workaround to get my point
>> to
>> > point
>> > setup working?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > * (*my setup in Sun
>> > Virtual Box
>> > *initiator*: 2.6.33-rc4 on
>> > Fedora Core
>> > 12 with
>> > fcoeadm tool
>> > *target*: 2.6.23 on Suse
>> Linux
>> > Enterprise Server
>> > initiator-target
>> connected
>> > over lossless
>> > connection in Sun Virtual Box(intel e1000
>> :bridged
>> > *pause frames
>> > enabled*)
>> > *)*
>> >
>> >
>> > Actually, I may have mis-spoken earlier. I just
>> > tried it
>> > and a similar
>> > setup just worked for me. I'm running the same
>> > release
>> > on the
>> > initiator,
>> > and the target is 2.6.23-1. I'm running on real
>> > servers,
>> > though,
>> > not under a virtual machine. It really
>> shouldn't
>> > matter,
>> > however,
>> > as long as the virtual NIC works correctly. I'm
>> > running
>> > Fedora 8
>> > on my target, and Fedora 10 on the initiator.
>> >
>> > I tried it with the initiator having the larger
>> > WWPN and
>> > also with
>> > the target having the larger WWPN, in case there
>> > was a bug
>> > related to that.
>> >
>> > It will take a few retries for FLOGI to go
>> through
>> > because
>> > it waits to see if FIP will work first.
>> > If it doesn't work for you, then I don't know
>> what
>> > it is.
>> > You could send me binary tcpdump capture and I
>> > might be able
>> > to point out the problem. Use
>> >
>> > tcpdump -p -i ethX -w /tmp/file -s 0
>> >
>> > before you do 'fcoeadm -c ethX' on the initiator
>> side.
>> >
>> > i am attaching the tcp dump file
>> > also the wireshark tcpdump
>> > please have a look and help me solve the issue.
>> >
>> > You could also try putting the interface on both
>> > sides into
>> > promiscuous mode, in case its a MAC filter
>> problem.
>> >
>> > The reason I gave the -p parameter on tcpdump is
>> > so that
>> > it *doesn't* go promiscuous, since it might hide
>> > the problem.
>> >
>> > Good luck,
>> > Joe
>> >
>> > thank you.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Joe Eykholt
>> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> > <mailto:[email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>
>> > <mailto:[email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>>> <mailto:[email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >
>> > <mailto:[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> > <mailto:[email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>
>> > <mailto:[email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>>>>> wrote:
>> >
>> > vinvishwa wrote:
>> >
>> > hi,
>> > i am trying to figure out the fcoe
>> login
>> > process in a
>> > point to point
>> > architecture
>> >
>> > In my setup the *target sends out
>> FLOGIs*
>> > (this is right
>> > as per the
>> > quickstart guide at open-fcoe)
>> >
>> > when the initiator is started it
>> sends
>> > an *FIP
>> > solicitation*
>> > and then starts sending FLOGIs but is
>> *not
>> > able to login*
>> >
>> > Can someone please elaborate the
>> *point to
>> > point fcoe
>> > login* process
>> >
>> >
>> > It is currently broken. The old target
>> > expects a
>> > non-standard interface
>> > in which the other end accepts the FLOGI
>> > with the
>> > fabric flag off
>> > indicating
>> > point to point, and with the assigned
>> FC_IDs in
>> > the FLOGI accept.
>> > I'm not sure why that's been broken in
>> the
>> > initiator, but
>> > point-to-point
>> > mode hasn't been enough of a priority.
>> >
>> > The correct, standard FC way of doing it
>> is for
>> > both sides to
>> > send a
>> > LS_ACC for FLOGI from fffffe to 0 and
>> then
>> > for the
>> > one with the
>> > higher WWPN
>> > to decide the FC_IDs and do a PLOGI.
>> >
>> > There's a FIP proposal (at least one) to
>> do
>> > VN to
>> > VN port
>> > without a
>> > fabric,
>> > and I hope we'll implement that at some
>> point.
>> >
>> > The current initiator sends out both a
>> FIP
>> > solicitation and
>> > non-FIP
>> > FLOGIs
>> > until it receives either a FIP frame, at
>> which
>> > point it
>> > enters FIP mode,
>> > or an LS_ACC for the FLOGI, at which
>> point it
>> > continues in
>> > non-FIP mode.
>> >
>> >
>> > Also i tried to figure out the fcoe
>> > initiator
>> > code but
>> > couldn't
>> > get the
>> > starting point
>> > Plz help me with the entry
>> > point of
>> > the code
>> >
>> >
>> > The module_init fcoe_init() is one entry
>> point.
>> > Another is
>> > the code
>> > that handles
>> > the creation of an new initiator thru
>> /sys
>> > write:
>> > fcoe_create().
>> >
>> > Joe
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -- -vinvishwa
>> >
>> >
>> > I don't know what the problem is.
>> >
>> > Have you tried putting both sides in promiscuous mode?
>> >
>> > ifconfig ethX promisc
>> >
>> > I don't really think that will fix it, but it is worth
>> a try.
>> >
>> > I looked at the traces. fcoe_pcap_100110.pcap showed
>> FLOGIs
>> > from both sides but no accepts from either. I can't
>> > explain that.
>> > The other trace showed FLOGIs only from the initiator,
>> > nothing
>> > received from the target. Why the difference? Was the
>> > wireshark
>> > done on the target side? Wireshark will go
>> promiscuous,
>> > so maybe
>> > that's the difference.
>> >
>> > On the initiator side, you could enable debug logging
>> and
>> > that
>> > might help us figure it out. Do this as root after the
>> > initiator is started:
>> >
>> > echo 15 >
>> /sys/module/libfc/parameters/debug_logging
>> > echo 3 >
>> /sys/module/fcoe/parameters/debug_logging
>> >
>> >
>> > Also add:
>> >
>> > echo 3 >
>> /sys/module/libfcoe/parameters/debug_logging
>> >
>> > We might as well get everything we can get!
>> >
>> >
>> > dmesg -n 8
>> > # wait at least 10 seconds with the initiator
>> > running then:
>> > dmesg | tail
>> >
>> >
>> > Make that
>> > dmesg | tail -100
>> >
>> > so we get a good hunk of log. If you could send that, it
>> may
>> > help.
>> >
>> >
>> > Good luck.
>> >
>> > Joe
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > devel mailing list
>> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> >
>> > http://www.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>>
>
[r...@localhost ~]# modprobe openfctgt
[r...@localhost ~]# modprobe fcoe
[r...@localhost ~]# ethtool -a eth0
Pause parameters for eth0:
Autonegotiate: off
RX: off
TX: off
[r...@localhost ~]# ethtool -A eth0 rx on tx on
[r...@localhost ~]# fcconf
Name WWPN FC-ID FC Network
eth0 20:00:00:22:15:bd:d9:32 0 No HBA UP
[r...@localhost ~]# fcconf eth0 enable
fcconf: device file /dev/openfc does not exist- check udev and rules
[r...@localhost ~]#
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: SMP
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: CPU: 1
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: EIP: 0060:[<f8b9768b>] Not tainted VLI
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.23.1 #1)
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: EIP is at openfct_session_create+0x18/0xce [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: eax: f5bd4000 ebx: f5b36400 ecx: 00010101 edx: f6dac080
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: esi: f6dac080 edi: 00000000 ebp: 00000000 esp: f5bc9e00
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 00d8 gs: 0000 ss: 0068
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: Process fcoethread/1 (pid: 3050, ti=f5bc9000 task=f5d7c620
task.ti=f5bc9000)
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: Stack: 0049474f 70736572 f5bc9e88 ffffffff f6dac080 f8ba86cc 00000002
00000000
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: f6d6d02c f8ba6a50 f5b36400 f6dac080 00000000 00000000 f8b988db
f6d6d02c
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: f8ba6a50 f8ba55be f5bc9e54 f8b98888 f6d6e82c f61d0e00 f5f509c0
f8ba211a
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: Call Trace:
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: [<f8b988db>] fcs_local_port_prli_accept+0x53/0x91 [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: [<f8ba55be>] sa_log+0x15/0x17 [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: [<f8b98888>] fcs_local_port_prli_accept+0x0/0x91 [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: [<f8ba211a>] fc_sess_recv_req+0x1d9/0x98d [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: [<f8ba2e74>] fc_sess_lookup_create+0xf8/0x101 [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: [<f8b9e815>] fc_local_port_recv_req+0xaf/0x159 [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: [<f8b9adfb>] fc_exch_recv_req+0x71e/0x7da [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: [<f8b9e766>] fc_local_port_recv_req+0x0/0x159 [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: [<f8ba548e>] sa_hash_lookup+0x34/0x3f [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: [<f8b9eb26>] fc_local_port_recv+0x267/0x326 [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: [<f8b9e766>] fc_local_port_recv_req+0x0/0x159 [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: [<f8ba484a>] fc_port_ingress+0x61/0x67 [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: [<f8b8485d>] fcoe_percpu_receive_thread+0x66e/0x792 [fcoe]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: [<f8b841ef>] fcoe_percpu_receive_thread+0x0/0x792 [fcoe]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: [<c043cf85>] kthread+0x38/0x5f
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: [<c043cf4d>] kthread+0x0/0x5f
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: [<c0405c0f>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: =======================
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: Code: 6e fb ff 89 f2 89 d8 5b 5e 5f e9 e0 a5 a7 c7 5b 5e 5f c3 55 57
56 53 83 ec 28 89 54 24 10 8b b8 04 21 00 00 8b 4a 1c 85 ff 75 04 <0f> 0b eb fe
8b 6f 2c 8b 55 00 eb 0d 3b 4d 10 0f 84 97 00 00 00
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:50 ...
kernel: EIP: [<f8b9768b>] openfct_session_create+0x18/0xce [openfctgt] SS:ESP
0068:f5bc9e00
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: invalid opcode: 0000 [#2]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: SMP
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: CPU: 0
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: EIP: 0060:[<f8b9768b>] Tainted: G D VLI
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.23.1 #1)
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: EIP is at openfct_session_create+0x18/0xce [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: eax: f5bd4000 ebx: f5b36400 ecx: 00010101 edx: f6dac080
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: esi: f6dac080 edi: 00000000 ebp: 00000000 esp: f5bcae00
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 00d8 gs: 0000 ss: 0068
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: Process fcoethread/0 (pid: 3049, ti=f5bca000 task=f5d7cc40
task.ti=f5bca000)
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: Stack: f8b850d5 f5b36a80 f5a11c00 f8b99a18 f6dac080 00000020 c05aaf73
f5a11c00
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: 00980000 f540042c f5b36400 f6dac080 00000000 00000000 f8b988db
00000001
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: f5f509c0 f5a11c00 00000004 f8b98888 f6d6f02c f61d0e00 f5f509c0
f8ba211a
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: Call Trace:
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: [<f8b850d5>] fcoe_frame_alloc+0x4e/0xed [fcoe]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: [<f8b99a18>] fc_exch_complete_locked+0x6d/0x9e [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: [<c05aaf73>] __alloc_skb+0x4d/0xfb
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: [<f8b988db>] fcs_local_port_prli_accept+0x53/0x91 [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: [<f8b98888>] fcs_local_port_prli_accept+0x0/0x91 [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: [<f8ba211a>] fc_sess_recv_req+0x1d9/0x98d [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: [<f8ba2e74>] fc_sess_lookup_create+0xf8/0x101 [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: [<f8b9e815>] fc_local_port_recv_req+0xaf/0x159 [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: [<f8b9adfb>] fc_exch_recv_req+0x71e/0x7da [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: [<f8b9e766>] fc_local_port_recv_req+0x0/0x159 [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: [<f8ba548e>] sa_hash_lookup+0x34/0x3f [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: [<f8b9eb26>] fc_local_port_recv+0x267/0x326 [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: [<f8b9e766>] fc_local_port_recv_req+0x0/0x159 [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: [<f8ba484a>] fc_port_ingress+0x61/0x67 [openfctgt]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: [<f8b8485d>] fcoe_percpu_receive_thread+0x66e/0x792 [fcoe]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: [<f8b841ef>] fcoe_percpu_receive_thread+0x0/0x792 [fcoe]
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: [<c043cf85>] kthread+0x38/0x5f
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: [<c043cf4d>] kthread+0x0/0x5f
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: [<c0405c0f>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: =======================
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: Code: 6e fb ff 89 f2 89 d8 5b 5e 5f e9 e0 a5 a7 c7 5b 5e 5f c3 55 57
56 53 83 ec 28 89 54 24 10 8b b8 04 21 00 00 8b 4a 1c 85 ff 75 04 <0f> 0b eb fe
8b 6f 2c 8b 55 00 eb 0d 3b 4d 10 0f 84 97 00 00 00
Message from sysl...@localhost at Feb 22 01:38:52 ...
kernel: EIP: [<f8b9768b>] openfct_session_create+0x18/0xce [openfctgt] SS:ESP
0068:f5bcae00
device eth0 entered promiscuous mode
mtu 1478
eth0: link down.
eth0: link up.
[3015]: scst: scst_unregister_target_template:336:Target template openfct
unregistered successfully
[3041]: scst: __scst_register_target_template:275:Target template openfct
registered successfully
eth0: link up.
mtu 1478
fc_local_port_flogi_resp: bad FLOGI response
fc_local_port_flogi_resp fffffe -> 000000 xids 0011 0001 ELS rep ELS LS_ACC
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at /root/open-fcoe-target/openfctgt/openfc_scst_pkt.h:119!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1]
SMP
Modules linked in: fcoe openfctgt scst_vdisk scst_disk scst scsi_transport_fc
fuse rfcomm l2cap bluetooth autofs4 sunrpc nf_conntrack_ipv4 ipt_REJECT
iptable_filter ip_tables nf_conntrack_ftp nf_conntrack_ipv6 xt_state
nf_conntrack nfnetlink xt_tcpudp ip6t_ipv6header ip6t_REJECT ip6table_filter
ip6_tables x_tables cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq dm_mirror dm_multipath dm_mod
ipv6 snd_hda_intel snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq
snd_seq_device snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm button snd_timer snd soundcore
snd_page_alloc parport_pc forcedeth parport sg pata_amd ahci ata_generic libata
sd_mod scsi_mod ext3 jbd mbcache uhci_hcd ohci_hcd ehci_hcd
CPU: 1
EIP: 0060:[<f8b9768b>] Not tainted VLI
EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.23.1 #1)
EIP is at openfct_session_create+0x18/0xce [openfctgt]
eax: f5bd4000 ebx: f5b36400 ecx: 00010101 edx: f6dac080
esi: f6dac080 edi: 00000000 ebp: 00000000 esp: f5bc9e00
ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 00d8 gs: 0000 ss: 0068
Process fcoethread/1 (pid: 3050, ti=f5bc9000 task=f5d7c620 task.ti=f5bc9000)
Stack: 0049474f 70736572 f5bc9e88 ffffffff f6dac080 f8ba86cc 00000002 00000000
f6d6d02c f8ba6a50 f5b36400 f6dac080 00000000 00000000 f8b988db f6d6d02c
f8ba6a50 f8ba55be f5bc9e54 f8b98888 f6d6e82c f61d0e00 f5f509c0 f8ba211a
Call Trace:
[<f8b988db>] fcs_local_port_prli_accept+0x53/0x91 [openfctgt]
[<f8ba55be>] sa_log+0x15/0x17 [openfctgt]
[<f8b98888>] fcs_local_port_prli_accept+0x0/0x91 [openfctgt]
[<f8ba211a>] fc_sess_recv_req+0x1d9/0x98d [openfctgt]
[<f8ba2e74>] fc_sess_lookup_create+0xf8/0x101 [openfctgt]
[<f8b9e815>] fc_local_port_recv_req+0xaf/0x159 [openfctgt]
[<f8b9adfb>] fc_exch_recv_req+0x71e/0x7da [openfctgt]
[<f8b9e766>] fc_local_port_recv_req+0x0/0x159 [openfctgt]
[<f8ba548e>] sa_hash_lookup+0x34/0x3f [openfctgt]
[<f8b9eb26>] fc_local_port_recv+0x267/0x326 [openfctgt]
[<f8b9e766>] fc_local_port_recv_req+0x0/0x159 [openfctgt]
[<f8ba484a>] fc_port_ingress+0x61/0x67 [openfctgt]
[<f8b8485d>] fcoe_percpu_receive_thread+0x66e/0x792 [fcoe]
[<f8b841ef>] fcoe_percpu_receive_thread+0x0/0x792 [fcoe]
[<c043cf85>] kthread+0x38/0x5f
[<c043cf4d>] kthread+0x0/0x5f
[<c0405c0f>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
=======================
Code: 6e fb ff 89 f2 89 d8 5b 5e 5f e9 e0 a5 a7 c7 5b 5e 5f c3 55 57 56 53 83
ec 28 89 54 24 10 8b b8 04 21 00 00 8b 4a 1c 85 ff 75 04 <0f> 0b eb fe 8b 6f 2c
8b 55 00 eb 0d 3b 4d 10 0f 84 97 00 00 00
EIP: [<f8b9768b>] openfct_session_create+0x18/0xce [openfctgt] SS:ESP
0068:f5bc9e00
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at /root/open-fcoe-target/openfctgt/openfc_scst_pkt.h:119!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#2]
SMP
Modules linked in: fcoe openfctgt scst_vdisk scst_disk scst scsi_transport_fc
fuse rfcomm l2cap bluetooth autofs4 sunrpc nf_conntrack_ipv4 ipt_REJECT
iptable_filter ip_tables nf_conntrack_ftp nf_conntrack_ipv6 xt_state
nf_conntrack nfnetlink xt_tcpudp ip6t_ipv6header ip6t_REJECT ip6table_filter
ip6_tables x_tables cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq dm_mirror dm_multipath dm_mod
ipv6 snd_hda_intel snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq
snd_seq_device snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm button snd_timer snd soundcore
snd_page_alloc parport_pc forcedeth parport sg pata_amd ahci ata_generic libata
sd_mod scsi_mod ext3 jbd mbcache uhci_hcd ohci_hcd ehci_hcd
CPU: 0
EIP: 0060:[<f8b9768b>] Tainted: G D VLI
EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.23.1 #1)
EIP is at openfct_session_create+0x18/0xce [openfctgt]
eax: f5bd4000 ebx: f5b36400 ecx: 00010101 edx: f6dac080
esi: f6dac080 edi: 00000000 ebp: 00000000 esp: f5bcae00
ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 00d8 gs: 0000 ss: 0068
Process fcoethread/0 (pid: 3049, ti=f5bca000 task=f5d7cc40 task.ti=f5bca000)
Stack: f8b850d5 f5b36a80 f5a11c00 f8b99a18 f6dac080 00000020 c05aaf73 f5a11c00
00980000 f540042c f5b36400 f6dac080 00000000 00000000 f8b988db 00000001
f5f509c0 f5a11c00 00000004 f8b98888 f6d6f02c f61d0e00 f5f509c0 f8ba211a
Call Trace:
[<f8b850d5>] fcoe_frame_alloc+0x4e/0xed [fcoe]
[<f8b99a18>] fc_exch_complete_locked+0x6d/0x9e [openfctgt]
[<c05aaf73>] __alloc_skb+0x4d/0xfb
[<f8b988db>] fcs_local_port_prli_accept+0x53/0x91 [openfctgt]
[<f8b98888>] fcs_local_port_prli_accept+0x0/0x91 [openfctgt]
[<f8ba211a>] fc_sess_recv_req+0x1d9/0x98d [openfctgt]
[<f8ba2e74>] fc_sess_lookup_create+0xf8/0x101 [openfctgt]
[<f8b9e815>] fc_local_port_recv_req+0xaf/0x159 [openfctgt]
[<f8b9adfb>] fc_exch_recv_req+0x71e/0x7da [openfctgt]
[<f8b9e766>] fc_local_port_recv_req+0x0/0x159 [openfctgt]
[<f8ba548e>] sa_hash_lookup+0x34/0x3f [openfctgt]
[<f8b9eb26>] fc_local_port_recv+0x267/0x326 [openfctgt]
[<f8b9e766>] fc_local_port_recv_req+0x0/0x159 [openfctgt]
[<f8ba484a>] fc_port_ingress+0x61/0x67 [openfctgt]
[<f8b8485d>] fcoe_percpu_receive_thread+0x66e/0x792 [fcoe]
[<f8b841ef>] fcoe_percpu_receive_thread+0x0/0x792 [fcoe]
[<c043cf85>] kthread+0x38/0x5f
[<c043cf4d>] kthread+0x0/0x5f
[<c0405c0f>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
=======================
Code: 6e fb ff 89 f2 89 d8 5b 5e 5f e9 e0 a5 a7 c7 5b 5e 5f c3 55 57 56 53 83
ec 28 89 54 24 10 8b b8 04 21 00 00 8b 4a 1c 85 ff 75 04 <0f> 0b eb fe 8b 6f 2c
8b 55 00 eb 0d 3b 4d 10 0f 84 97 00 00 00
EIP: [<f8b9768b>] openfct_session_create+0x18/0xce [openfctgt] SS:ESP
0068:f5bcae00
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
