Robert Love wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 16:25 -0700, Joe Eykholt wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> So, your patch is OK, but please take out the debug for the FPMA case
>> and the extra memcpy.
Oops, I meant memset.
> The extra memset can be improved, but why remove the FPMA debug
> statement? As long as we support SPMA I'd like to have a chance at
> knowing when we're doing FPMA or SPMA. This isn't fast path so I don't
> see why you dislike it.
It's just noise to me. If you don't see the SPMA message then you'll
know you're doing FPMA. However, if you really want it, it's not that
big a deal to me, go ahead.
Joe
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
