On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 16:26 -0700, Robert Love wrote: > I went through my patchwork queue and picked out the patches that didn't > seem to be under debate. Here's the summary: > > applied to fcoe-next: > libfcoe: FIP link keep-alive should continue while ... > libfcoe: Avoid hang when receiving non-critical descriptors > libfc: Retry a rejected PRLI request > libfc: Honor LS_ACC response codes for PRLI > fcoe: clean up TBD comments in FCoE prototype header
Thanks Robert. > > pending resolution: > libfcoe: Handle duplicate critical descriptors > send solicitation after 2.5 * fka instead of 3 * fka > libfc: Drop all LOGOs received while processing previous LOGO > libfc: Do not reject unsolicited PRLO I'm trying to re-work these patches, and will submit them once I'm done with the testing. But for "send solicitation after 2.5 * fka instead of 3 * fka" patch, if Joe doesnt have objections, we can submit it as is. > > I made Joe's suggested changes for indention on patch > "libfc: Honor LS_ACC response codes for PRLI" but my general testing may > not have exercised those paths. Someone might want to take a look at it > to make sure I didn't introduce an issue; it seemed pretty > straight-forward. I can take a look if you can post the patch. Thanks again. Bhanu > > //Rob > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
