Greetings Joe,
While doing a pull recently for v2.6.35-rc2, I ran into a merge conflict
below in drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c:fc_rport_recv_pril_req()
with the original PLOGI driven target provider hooks changes that I have
been including into the lio-core-2.6.git tree for tcm_fc.
>From taking a quick look, I assume that active and passing prov->prli()
calls need to appear under the new roles assignment, namely under:
if (fcp_parm & FCP_SPPF_TARG_FCN)
roles |= FC_RPORT_ROLE_FCP_TARGET;
for the upstream e44a21b726 commit. Is there anything else that should
be taken into consideration to get this running again..?
Best,
--nab
<<<<<<< HEAD
/*
* Go through all the service parameter pages and build
* response. If plen indicates longer SPP than standard,
* use that. The entire response has been pre-cleared above.
*/
spp = &pp->spp;
mutex_lock(&fc_prov_mutex);
while (len >= plen) {
spp->spp_type = rspp->spp_type;
spp->spp_type_ext = rspp->spp_type_ext;
resp = 0;
if (rspp->spp_type < FC_FC4_PROV_SIZE) {
prov = fc_active_prov[rspp->spp_type];
if (prov)
resp = prov->prli(rdata, plen, rspp, spp);
prov = fc_passive_prov[rspp->spp_type];
if (prov) {
passive = prov->prli(rdata, plen, rspp, spp);
if (!resp || passive == FC_SPP_RESP_ACK)
resp = passive;
}
}
if (!resp) {
if (spp->spp_flags & FC_SPP_EST_IMG_PAIR)
resp |= FC_SPP_RESP_CONF;
else
resp |= FC_SPP_RESP_INVL;
}
spp->spp_flags |= resp;
len -= plen;
rspp = (struct fc_els_spp *)((char *)rspp + plen);
spp = (struct fc_els_spp *)((char *)spp + plen);
}
mutex_unlock(&fc_prov_mutex);
/*
* Send LS_ACC. If this fails, the originator should retry.
*/
f_ctl = FC_FC_EX_CTX | FC_FC_LAST_SEQ;
f_ctl |= FC_FC_END_SEQ | FC_FC_SEQ_INIT;
ep = fc_seq_exch(sp);
fc_fill_fc_hdr(fp, FC_RCTL_ELS_REP, ep->did, ep->sid,
FC_TYPE_ELS, f_ctl, 0);
lport->tt.seq_send(lport, sp, fp);
=======
/* reinitialize remote port roles */
rdata->ids.roles = FC_RPORT_ROLE_UNKNOWN;
/*
* Go through all the service parameter pages and build
* response. If plen indicates longer SPP than standard,
* use that. The entire response has been pre-cleared above.
*/
spp = &pp->spp;
while (len >= plen) {
spp->spp_type = rspp->spp_type;
spp->spp_type_ext = rspp->spp_type_ext;
spp->spp_flags = rspp->spp_flags & FC_SPP_EST_IMG_PAIR;
resp = FC_SPP_RESP_ACK;
switch (rspp->spp_type) {
case 0: /* common to all FC-4 types */
break;
case FC_TYPE_FCP:
fcp_parm = ntohl(rspp->spp_params);
if (fcp_parm & FCP_SPPF_RETRY)
rdata->flags |= FC_RP_FLAGS_RETRY;
rdata->supported_classes = FC_COS_CLASS3;
if (fcp_parm & FCP_SPPF_INIT_FCN)
roles |= FC_RPORT_ROLE_FCP_INITIATOR;
if (fcp_parm & FCP_SPPF_TARG_FCN)
roles |= FC_RPORT_ROLE_FCP_TARGET;
rdata->ids.roles = roles;
spp->spp_params = htonl(lport->service_params);
break;
default:
resp = FC_SPP_RESP_INVL;
break;
}
spp->spp_flags |= resp;
len -= plen;
rspp = (struct fc_els_spp *)((char *)rspp + plen);
spp = (struct fc_els_spp *)((char *)spp + plen);
}
/*
* Send LS_ACC. If this fails, the originator should retry.
*/
f_ctl = FC_FC_EX_CTX | FC_FC_LAST_SEQ;
f_ctl |= FC_FC_END_SEQ | FC_FC_SEQ_INIT;
ep = fc_seq_exch(sp);
fc_fill_fc_hdr(fp, FC_RCTL_ELS_REP, ep->did, ep->sid,
FC_TYPE_ELS, f_ctl, 0);
lport->tt.seq_send(lport, sp, fp);
>>>>>>> e44a21b7268a022c7749f521c06214145bd161e4
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
