Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 02:09:18AM CET, [email protected] wrote: >On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 01:55 -0800, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Or perhaps this should be applied to net-next? >> >I think this should go through scsi-misc as all the other >libfc/libfcoe/fcoe patches do. > >> Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 07:05:35AM CET, [email protected] wrote: >> >Check for bonding master and refuse to use that. >> > >> >Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> >> >--- >> > drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c | 4 +--- >> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> > >> >diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c >> >index 9f9600b..3becc6a 100644 >> >--- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c >> >+++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c >> >@@ -285,9 +285,7 @@ static int fcoe_interface_setup(struct fcoe_interface >> >*fcoe, >> > } >> > >> > /* Do not support for bonding device */ >> >- if ((netdev->priv_flags & IFF_MASTER_ALB) || >> >- (netdev->priv_flags & IFF_SLAVE_INACTIVE) || >> >- (netdev->priv_flags & IFF_MASTER_8023AD)) { >> >+ if (netdev->priv_flags & IFF_BONDING && netdev->flags & IFF_MASTER) { >> > FCOE_NETDEV_DBG(netdev, "Bonded interfaces not supported\n"); >> > return -EOPNOTSUPP; >> > } >> >-- >> >1.7.3.4 >> > > >James, feel free to pick up this patch. I don't have anything in my fcoe >tree right now that it would conflict with. I'll also put it in my tree >and resend if you don't put it into scsi-misc directly.
What's the status of this? Maybe this should rather go thru net-next Davem? Thanks Jirka > >Acked-by: Robert Love <[email protected]> > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
