The rcu callback fc_rport_free_rcu() just calls a kfree(),
so we use kfree_rcu() instead of the call_rcu(fc_rport_free_rcu).

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c |   14 +-------------
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
index a7175ad..29abab0 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
@@ -151,18 +151,6 @@ static struct fc_rport_priv *fc_rport_create(struct 
fc_lport *lport,
 }
 
 /**
- * fc_rport_free_rcu() - Free a remote port
- * @rcu: The rcu_head structure inside the remote port
- */
-static void fc_rport_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
-{
-       struct fc_rport_priv *rdata;
-
-       rdata = container_of(rcu, struct fc_rport_priv, rcu);
-       kfree(rdata);
-}
-
-/**
  * fc_rport_destroy() - Free a remote port after last reference is released
  * @kref: The remote port's kref
  */
@@ -171,7 +159,7 @@ static void fc_rport_destroy(struct kref *kref)
        struct fc_rport_priv *rdata;
 
        rdata = container_of(kref, struct fc_rport_priv, kref);
-       call_rcu(&rdata->rcu, fc_rport_free_rcu);
+       kfree_rcu(rdata, rcu);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
1.7.4
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to