Thanks Kern, So in conclusion, Bacula can implement Exchange mailbox backup with full semantics (probably more semantics than you can cope with :-) in very short order via an interface to OpenChange commandline tools. Hence my reference to the Asterisk approach.
For anything else, both Bacula and OpenChange are constrained by upstream libraries and cannot link against each other. There are two small doors that could be left open for the future: Bacula could implement "or later version" in its forthcoming modified GPL, and OpenChange could dual-license its work with, say, the GPL. This would be useful only in the case where very large bodies of trusted code used by either Bacula or OpenChange (or both) are replaced by functionally similar code under a different license, which doesn't seem likely to happen in the immediate future. Nevertheless, there may be value in this approach. I don't see any other options. Do you? -- Dan Shearer [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.openchange.org/listinfo/devel
