On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 17:36 +1000, Brad Hards wrote: > Julien, > > I've started work on 0x66, which is the "real" SetReadFlags operation. > However > we currently have a "SetReadFlags" operation as 0x11. That should be called > SetMessageReadFlags. > > I'm about to rename 0x11 to be SetMessageReadFlags. However I note that you > recently hit the problem where there can be "optional" data in the middle of > the request (depending on whether it is a public or private folder) and were > investigating a fix. > > Is that going to cause a major conflict for you?
No this won't cause any conflicts unless you write the IDL again: I have already renamed the 0x11 call in exchange.idl on the mapiproxy branch and have added the IDL for opnum 0x66. -- Julien Kerihuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenChange Project Manager GPG Fingerprint: 0B55 783D A781 6329 108A B609 7EF6 FE11 A35F 1F79
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.openchange.org/listinfo/devel
