the idea is to keep the think as compact and consistent as possible - there are more easier to use :D

I will take care of it.

regards,
bogdan

Walter Schober wrote:

Sure! If the outcome is the same, that would do it also!
And it's more controllable in the script.

P.S.: I was happy that it worked at all, that I didn't look for a better
solution :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 5:08 PM
To: Walter Schober
Cc: devel@openser.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] Extended nathelper

Hi,

in this case shouldn't be simpler just to add an parameter to add_rvc_param() to tell if the received should be added as URI param or header param?

will this cover your scenario?

regards,
Bogdan


_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to