Replies I'll make sure to spend some time today to get you some better information
tavis Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > Hi Tavis, > > what messages are you referring to? requests or replies? some more > info? maybe I will be able to help you with.. > > regards, > bogdan > > Tavis P wrote: > >> I've encountered some problems with the suggested workarounds, when the >> alias' are set to include the server port there seems to be some >> problems with the tm module "missing" (not realizing they are meant for >> itself) some messages and forwarding them instead. >> >> I havn't had the time to debug this observation properly, i'm hoping to >> be able too in the coming weeks. I think right now forwarding messages >> to another port on the same server is very broken. I'll a little >> disclaimer in the wiki section on alias >> >> >> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: >> >> >>> Hi Tavi, >>> >>> I gave more thinking on the issues, and as you said, is more a problem >>> of logic than programming. I would say the best solution is to let the >>> code as it is, as it offer more flexibility, and to document better >>> the "alias" behaviour to avoid future misunderstandings. >>> >>> What changed my mind? here is an example: you have the proxy >>> listening on udp and tcp on 2 ports; and it serves the domain >>> "mysip.net"...if we change the code, we will have to strictly define >>> the aliases (all proto and port combination -> 4 entries) to be sure >>> your domain also covers the 2 protos and ports...and it's not natural. >>> >>> So, I will add more info in the wiki page for "aliases"....is it >>> reasonable? >>> >>> > > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
