Hi Martin,

I made a fix for this problem - please update from cvs. It will be great if you could test it to see if the problem is fixed or if no side effects pop up.

regards,
bogdan

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:

Hi Martin,

thanks for report - indeed, it seams to be a problem - I was able to reproduce the scenario. I will start working on it, but it will be better if you also open a new bug report on the tracker.

Thanks and regards,
bogdan

Martin Koenig wrote:

Hello all,

in the given scenario, a CANCEL-message is t_relay()-ed to the next hop user
agent in transport UDP, and the target agent does not to it. However,
openser is not re-transmitting the cancel message:

#
U 2006/05/30 10:35:14.928141 USERAGENT-A:5060 -> OPENSER:5060
CANCEL sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
USERAGENT-A:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-b42132959a0eaae2d4f43ba197d4c249;rport=5060.
From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=1548336820.
To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone>.
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 2 CANCEL.
Max-Forwards: 68.
Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;transport=udp>.
Content-Length: 0.
.

#
U 2006/05/30 10:35:14.928806 OPENSER:5060 -> USERAGENT-B:5060
CANCEL sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP OPENSER;branch=z9hG4bK5ef1.bea7a8f6.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
USERAGENT-A:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-b42132959a0eaae2d4f43ba197d4c249;rport=5060.
From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=1548336820.
To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone>.
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 2 CANCEL.
Max-Forwards: 67.
Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;transport=udp>.
Content-Length: 0.
.

#
U 2006/05/30 10:35:14.928835 OPENSER:5060 -> PROXY-B:5060
SIP/2.0 200 canceling.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
USERAGENT:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-b42132959a0eaae2d4f43ba197d4c249;rport=5060.
From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=1548336820.
To:
<sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone>;tag=54438713ac33febc84bf508cca
f41100-cfc5.
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 2 CANCEL.
Content-Length: 0.
.

The second cancel is the only cancel ever that openser will send out. I
believe it should start re-transmission of the cancel message after 500ms,
then 1000ms etc. Is this a known issue?

Best regards,
Martin


_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel



_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel



_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to