> -----Original Message----- > From: Tavis P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 3:04 PM > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Devel] RE: [Users] OpenSER - one year old > > > Juha Heinanen wrote: > > Douglas Garstang writes: > > > > > My comments are constructive. I've constructively stated several > > > times that the documentation is very bad. Each time I've > made this > > > constructive comment, I've been attacked. In my previous > post, I made > > > another constructive comment. I said that maybe the reason the > > > documentation is so bad is that the project isn't that old. > > > > rather that complaining, learn to read the relevant pieces > of code and > > write better documentation. > > > > -- juha > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > > > > > I find it interesting that you would characterize your statements as > "constructive" and the responses you've received as "attacks" > > I believe this may be one of the central issues
Why do you consider my opinion that the documentation is bad, and that it should be maintained by the developers interesting? _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
