On Monday 02 October 2006 08:46, Juha Heinanen wrote: > docs and code are ok, see > > http://www.openser.org/docs/pseudo-variables-1.1.x.html
Oh well, it appears I'm a bit behind these changes. I was under the impression that only the notation was unified for the two, not the concept as well. I recall that not long ago, pseudo variables was used to refer only to internal (mostly read-only) stuff: $ruri, $si, $fu, ... and that AVPs were considered a different beast. Anyway, in the above document it mentions that AVP aliases are noted as $avp($alias_name). Is this correct, because I recall that the $ sign was removed as an alias prefix? Also it says that if the [si] prefix is missing from an AVP name is considered a string AVP, while I also recall that the [si] prefix was make mandatory for AVPs in 1.1.x Now as far as I remember from what was posted to this mailing list the notation should be like: $avp([si]:avp_name) - AVP notation where the [si] prefix cannot be missing $avp(alias_name) - AVP alias notation Should these errors be corrected in the document at the link above or is my recollection of this things incorrect? -- Dan _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
