On Tuesday 28 November 2006 13:20, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > Hi Dan, > > the issues you are referring are not directly related to the MI > interface, but to the modules implementing transports for it (like > fifo, unixsock, xmlrpc, etc).
Well, it was a generic and shorthand way of addressing them. > > so, the syntax part is managed by the transport modules and can be > different from transport to transport. > > as yo said, for FIFO it is not an issue as it a stream like connection > - you read until the other party closes the connection. it's not an issue for STREAM like connectins that close after the command, but it is if they don't. > > we will consider this aspects when we will develop new module, > especially the one oriented on DATAGRAM communication. I think this is important to do for STREAM connections as well. What if I don't want to close the stream connection after a request, but want to keep it open and issue multiple commands on it? Besides it won't hurt to have 2 LF at the end of the message, no matter what kind of transport they use, it'll only make the messaging clearer and more consistent across all MI implementations. -- Dan _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
