On Montag, 14. Mai 2007, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > It is about DB re-organizing, I think it was a good point Klaus made > some time ago - all the tables should have a prefix identifying the > module they belong to. Right now there are tens of tables and for some > of them you do not have any clue what module is using them. > > So, there are 3 directions here: > 1) renaming the tables (adding a prefix of fix len) > 2) to be able to configure what tables should be installed (we have > the core, presence, extra - right now, but something for details would > be good - maybe based on modules ?) > 3) what Henning suggested - have a general description of DB and > some tools to generate particular DB definitions for mysql, postgres, > dbtext, etc..
Ok, later we can easily add some prefixes. For now i would like to stay with the current layout, no need to do more then a few task at once. :-) Are there any objections using parts of the SER scripts and schema files for this task? This would me allow to save many hours, otherwise i need to recreate all these stuff from the scratch. I mean, this is GPL code to, and i would add of course proper copyright headers (giving credit) to their files. I do some basic tests with the db schema system they created, and it works and fits fairly well. Henning _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
