If I may have a say ... I would include this also in the core. And as pointed by Bogdan, SDP is signalling also ... so I would not see it so bad having the parser functions in the core with the option of the modules modifying the SDP.
BTW, Ovidiiu ... in your email I read that you are creating the parser ... from scratch? Would not it be a good idea to hunt for an already existing SDP library and integrate it? Cesc On 8/8/07, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Henning, > > SDP is also signalling part (for media) and we are evaluation _only_ > parsing functions, not functions to manipulate and do SDP changes. > > currently there are 2 modules (nathelper and mediaproxy) parsing SDP and > there is an intense demand for other SDP related functionalities (like > being able to investigate SDP from script, etc); so makes no sense to > have n modules, each implementing a parser. > > We can have a parser in core and the modules will use it for whatever > specific purposes. > > If you make the parser a module, it will be rather a library than a > module and it will create extra inter-module dependencies that we > complicate thinks even more. > > Thanks and regards, > Bogdan > > Henning Westerholt wrote: > > On Tuesday 31 July 2007, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > > > >> Hi Ovidiu, > >> > >> If this will be a collection of functions for parsing, I see no reason > >> for not trying to include them in core. But for such a decision, more > >> info will be needed. > >> > > > > Hello, > > > > integrating SDP parser functionality into the core would be the start > for > > providing more and more SDP and media stream related functions in > OpenSER. > > > > I think we should try to stay on focus. > > > > - OpenSER is a multi-functional, multi-purpose SIP server: router, > switch, > > registrar, application server, redirect server, gateway, etc.. > > - OpenSER is only about signaling, but there are media adds-on > > > > (some quotes of a VON talk of Bogdan) > > > > In my opinion we're quite good in this area. But we've already enough > problems > > to support SIP and all the strange implementations out there. I don't > think > > its a good move to add to much SDP to our problem set. > > > > So i think a module implementation of a sdp parser would make more > sense. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Henning > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@openser.org > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
