Patches item #1495434, was opened at 2006-05-26 10:26
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by henningw
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743022&aid=1495434&group_id=139143
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: modules
Group: ver devel
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Bogdan (bogdan_iancu)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: New OpenSER function: t_add_final_response
Initial Comment:
We've encountered a problem with the current branch
handling. Suppose the
following setup:
Phones A, X, Y all in the same net, connected to
OpenSER. Phones X and Y are
both registered with the same number. Additionally
phone X has a redirection
to some other phone.
Phone A calls the number of phone X. OpenSER branches
and the INVITE is sent
to both X and Y.
Phone Y is ringing and Phone X sends 302 to OpenSER.
Here's the problem: the
302 is held while Y still rings. A gets bored and hangs
up, which releases
the 302: it is sent to the hung up phone A.
In behalf of Marc Haisenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What we want to happen instead is to consider 302 to be
a final response in
this case and immediately forward it to A, and cancel Y.
First I've hardcoded this as I needed to understand
what's happening, how the
branching works and generally where I need OpenSER to
kick ;-) After I've
found out I thought about implementing this in a more
clean way as we'll
probably need to handle other responses the same way.
My current solution looks like this: I've added new
function
t_add_final_response("123") for reply routes which adds
123 to the list of
response codes that should be considered final. The
patch I've attached
allows you to specify up to 8 such responses, definable
through config.h.
It works as expected, but before I finalize and submit
the patch I'd like some
feedback from you, especially on where to put methods
and whether the
approach I've used is good or whether you know a better
way.
Thanks a lot,
Marc
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Henning Westerholt (henningw)
Date: 2007-09-27 07:45
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=337916
Originator: NO
This patch is rather old, is it still needed?
Cheers,
Henning
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743022&aid=1495434&group_id=139143
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
