On Thursday 18 October 2007, Juha Heinanen wrote: > i consider it confusing if tables hang around in the database that are > not used by any of the modules that i'm using. > > it would be ok for me to list the installed tables in openserctlrc > file. the default could be all.
That would be fine as it will be a consistent unique list of tables that are used by any operation on the database. But the split with standard/extra/presence only complicates management. The fact that you have to answer a question from the script and then also add some HAS_EXTRA/HAS_PRESENCE variable to openserctlrc to help it deal with it later, makes it confusing. > regarding serweb, it would be better > to have it in a separate package altogether. I'm of the same mind. I have no idea why we define tables for another application. -- Dan _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
