Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> oh, please no... Andrew, this loop can be very very long when having > 10,000
> tasks on the machine...
> we have had enough such issues in OpenVZ and just don't want to come through
> this again.
> Also sum of RUNNING + UNINTERRUPTIBLE is required for per-container loadavg
> calculations.
>
Hi, Kirill,
I've asked Paul Menage to help us with this scenario by adding a per-container
task list.
Would you be ok, if we walked the per-container task list. We could further
optimize
the routine by adding
1. A container id (avoid parsing file paths to uniquely identify a container)
2. If we cannot do (1), then cache container paths
The other option is of-course what Pavel posted, but I think the amortized cost
of tracking
task state at the time of task state change or looping over tasks on demand
should be the
same.
Do you agree in general with containerstats? How we build (walk the task list
or at the
time of task state change) is flexible with containerstats.
Thanks for your comments!
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
