Cedric Le Goater wrote: > Pavel Emelianov wrote: >> The set of functions process_session, task_session, process_group >> and task_pgrp is confusing, as the names can be mixed with each other >> when looking at the code for a long time. >> >> The proposals are to >> * equip the functions that return the integer with _nr suffix to >> represent that fact, >> * and to make all functions work with task (not process) by making >> the common prefix of the same name. >> >> For monotony the routines signal_session() and set_signal_session() >> are replaced with task_session_nr() and set_task_session(), especially >> since they are only used with the explicit task->signal dereference. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I think we all agreed on this one. Can you send it to lkml@ as a > candidate for -mm ?
I already did that actually. But Andrew didn't answer so I decided that he considers this patch to be the part of the pid namespaces. I will resend it this week separately if get no other response from him. > Thanks, > > C. > Thanks, Pavel _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
