On 7/10/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew, how about we merge enough of the container framework to
> support CFS? Bits we could leave out for now include container_clone()
> support and the nsproxy subsystem, fork/exit callback hooks, and
> possibly leave cpusets alone for now (which would also mean we could
> skip the automatic release-agent stuff). I'm in Tokyo for the Linux
> Foundation Japan symposium right now, but I should be able to get the
> new patchset to you for Friday afternoon.
mm.. Given that you propose leaving bits out for the 2.6.23 merge, and
that changes are still pending and that nothing will _use_ the framework in
2.6.23
That's what I was originally thinking too, but since CFS has been
merged, CFS group scheduling would use it.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
