Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > Okay, some questions. > > * What do you think about not allowing duplicate names across different > tags? ie. there's only one ethX anywhere but it's visible only in a > specific namespace (and maybe in the default global one). Or does > everyone need its own eth0. If this is acceptable, the problem becomes > _much_ simpler.
I agree, and unfortunately this is the problem I am really trying to solve. Everyone namespace has it's own loopback interface. > * I think we can do away with the magic tag and use a pointer to > vfsmount instead. So, a process which wants to be in certain namespace > can bind-mount /sysfs to its own /sysfs and make needed sysfs nodes > bound to the mount. Does this sound okay? Such process should probably > be in its own chrooted environment to function properly. That would actually be preferable. > * I haven't really followed the containers thread. Do people generally > agree on including it in mainline when we have all the fancy > virtualization stuff? Generally. Assuming all of the i's are dotted and all of the t's crossed. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
