On 08/06, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > > Oleg Nesterov wrote: > >On 08/06, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > >>Oleg Nesterov wrote: > >>>On 07/26, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > >>>>The reason to release namespaces after reparenting is that when task > >>>>exits it may send a signal to its parent (SIGCHLD), but if the parent > >>>>has already exited its namespaces there will be no way to decide what > >>>>pid to dever to him - parent can be from different namespace. > >>>I almost forgot about this one... > >>> > >>>After reading the whole series, I can't understand the above explanation > >>>any longer. The parent can't be from different namespace, either we have > >>>another sub-thread, or we reparent the child to /sbin/init which should > >>>be from the same namespace. > >>If the child that is a new namespace's init is exiting its parent is from > >>the > >>different namespace. > > > >In that case it doesn't have childs. The were SIGKILL'ed before > >exit_notify(). > > It does not, but it's parent - does :)
Yes. But in that case forget_original_parent() is no-op! This means that it is not needed to move exit_task_namepsace() after. > >>Moreover, we will probably want to implement "entering" > >>the pid namespace, so having tasks with parents from another namespace > >>will > >>be OK. > > > >Well. I saw this word "entering", but I don't know the meaning. Just > >curious, > >could you explain? > > "Entering" means "moving task to arbitrary namespace" Heh. Very much nontrivial, good luck :) At least we need to grow ->numbers[], and if its pid was pinned... > >And, if an exiting task has a child which is already from another > >namespace, > >why can't we release our namespace before re-parenting? I guess I need to > >know what "entering" means to understand this... > > One of the desired actions was the following: > 1. task X clones the new namespace with the child Y as this namespace's > init; > 2. task X waits for SIGCHILD to come informing that the namespace is dead. > In this scenario we need to set the Y's pid as it is seen from X's > namespace in siginfo. Yes sure. But again, how this is connected to "we should do exit_task_namespace() after forget_original_parent()" ? I guess I missed something stupid and simple... Oleg. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
