Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I found why first version should be rejected, and, no, it is not > documentation updates. Here is version 2:
I care about the documentation because it is the best thing we have for enforcing sane sysctl table usage. After looking at the problem. While I can't remove ctl_name from the sysctl tables easily. What I can do is check at registration time if a sysctl table is sane, and print an error message and fail to register that table if it has problems. Once that is in place I will have no problems killing CTL_UNNUMBERED. Eric _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
