On 9/25/07, David Rientjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If I echo -n 8191 > memory.limit_in_bytes, I'm still only going to be able
> to charge one page on my x86_64. And then my program's malloc(5000) is
> going to fail, which leads to the inevitable head scratching.
This is a very unrealistic argument. Page-size rounding really has no
effect on any reasonable-sized memory cgroup.
Expressing it in bytes seems reasonable to me, since they are after
all the fundamental unit that's being counted ("kilobytes" are
explicitly an aggregation of "bytes").
Paul
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
