Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> The blessed way for standard caches is to use it.
> Besides, this may give this cache a better alignment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
yes of course. thanks.
Acked-by: Cedric Le Goater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/kernel/nsproxy.c b/kernel/nsproxy.c
> index ee68964..31351cc 100644
> --- a/kernel/nsproxy.c
> +++ b/kernel/nsproxy.c
> @@ -222,8 +222,7 @@ void exit_task_namespaces(struct task_st
>
> static int __init nsproxy_cache_init(void)
> {
> - nsproxy_cachep = kmem_cache_create("nsproxy", sizeof(struct nsproxy),
> - 0, SLAB_PANIC, NULL);
> + nsproxy_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(nsproxy, SLAB_PANIC);
> return 0;
> }
>
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
>
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
