On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 16:30 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > Following patch is for successful rmdir in memory cgroup. > > Currently, rmdir against memory cgroup will fail if charged page caches are > in cgroup. > (even if no tasks in cgroup.) > > I don't like this. This patch implements "forced" uncharge against memory > cgroup. > Uncharged pages will be charged again when some other cgroup/task accesses it. > > I wonder that all unmapped page-caches in cgroup should be uncharged if "1" > is written to > control_type. > > I'm grad if I can hear memory controller's policy about "rmdir" against > no-task-cgroup.
Works for me.. elm3b155:/dev/cgroup/xxx # cat tasks elm3b155:/dev/cgroup/xxx # elm3b155:/dev/cgroup/xxx # cat memory.usage_in_bytes 16384 elm3b155:/dev/cgroup/xxx # echo -n 0 > memory.control_type elm3b155:/dev/cgroup/xxx # cat memory.usage_in_bytes 0 Thanks, Badari _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
