From: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:53:52 +0400
> This routine scans the ipv6_fl_list whose update is > protected with the socket lock and the ip6_sk_fl_lock. > > Since the socket lock is not taken in the lookup, use > the other one. > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied. But I notice that I was wrong in my email, we don't hold the socket lock here. What prevents an unlink from the socket's list and thus a reference count of zero occurring for a brief moment? _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
