Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Guys how complete do you fee the pid namespace support is that
> has been merged into Linus's tree?
>
> My impression until I started reading through code earlier today
> was that the support was just about done except for a couple of
> tricky details.
Yes It looks sane.
Here's what I have in mind :
* there are some patches from suka that make sure the pid namespace init
is not getting abusively killed by one of this children
* the pid cleanup is not complete
. locks
. kthread (i should work soon on improving kthread to support
signals)
IMO, the proc mount shouldn't be under the pid namespace. we will
need that sooner or later.
C.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
