Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> +2. Intentionnaly, two equal user ids in different user namespaces >> + should not be equal from the VFS point of view. In other >> + words, user 10 in one user namespace shouldn't have the same >> + access permissions to files, beloging to user 10 in another >> + namespace. But currently this is not so. > > I don't know where this is going to land for a final call. > But if the pid namespace has a chance of landing under CONFIG_BROKEN > for the final stable release.
I prefered immature but he, any config name would do, just to make sure it doesn't get shipped by default in distros > We seriously want to consider the user namespace for the same treatment. > We all seem to agree that it is incomplete. yes. C. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
