Denis V. Lunev wrote:
Daniel Lezcano wrote:
The objective we have is to remove the fl_net field from the struct flowi.
In the previous patch, we make the network namespace to go up to the dst_entry.
This patch makes an example in how we can use the dst_entry/rtable combined with
a container_of to retrieve the network namespace when we have the flowi
parameter.
One restriction is we should pass always a flowi parameter coming from a struct
dst_entry.
this is an obfuscation IMHO. You use rtable instead of flowi, so
- rtable obtain flowi meaning and keeps original meaning
- stack usage in increased
Yes, you are right. Using container_of is not a good idea finally.
So, for the case, I think it is better to have an additional parameter
on IP route output path. (There is a device on the input one).
I thought that at the beginning, but I was not inclined to change
exported functions API, so I looked a way to avoid that but I failed
miserably :)
Obviously, the ip route output path extra parameter is the cleanest way
to introduce the network namespace pointer in the routing code. So why not ?
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
