Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> There is no real additional cost in using task_active_pid_ns and
> by doing so it means we do not need to audit the callers of pid_vnr
> closely, to ensure they are always called on living processes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> kernel/pid.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c
> index 54d7634..a7ecfce 100644
> --- a/kernel/pid.c
> +++ b/kernel/pid.c
> @@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ pid_t pid_nr_ns(struct pid *pid, struct pid_namespace *ns)
>
> pid_t pid_vnr(struct pid *pid)
> {
> - return pid_nr_ns(pid, current->nsproxy->pid_ns);
> + return pid_nr_ns(pid, task_active_pid_ns(current));
NAK. Your version will make more dereferences and one
condition check (if (pid != NULL)). Besides, dead process
can never call this thing - it is even never scheduled
for execution.
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pid_vnr);
>
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
