Hello Pavel ! Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >> Here's the unshare part if you want to fold that with your patch. > > Thanks, Cedric. I'll pick that up. > >> Thanks, > > OK, thanks everyone, I'll try to cook the final patch today > and send it to Andrew as an RFC.
As Al said it, it's probably not the direction to follow to extend the clone flags :) But the problem being real, I think we need to insist. First, we could simplify the API by using child_tidptr to pass a 64bits array of flags. This would still be a brutal syscall argument hijack but we can't do better without a new syscall. Next, we could send the same code using a new syscall. I have time to work on that. C. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
