On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:51:59 +0300 "Denis V. Lunev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could hardly imagine why sombady needs to assign 0.0.0.0 as an interface > address or interface destination address. The kernel will behave in a strage > way in several places if this is possible, as ifa_local != 0 is considered > as initialized/non-initialized state of the ifa. > > Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > This is used as a way to bring device up in lots of existing documentation. So please don't change. -- Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
