[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I'm just worried about the accumulation of what feels like ad hoc
>> namespaces, causing a very large combination matrix, a lot of which don't
>> make sense.
>
> Hmm, if we were to just call this CLONE_NEWDEV, would that (a) make
> sense and (b) suitably address your (certainly valid) concern?
>
> Basically for now CLONE_NEWDEV wouldn't yet be fully implemented, only
> unsharing unix98 ptys...
That would make sense to me. Also see Eric's note about uevent,
however; and there are probably other issues like it.
-hpa
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
