On 04/17/2008 12:17 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We noticed this while working on pts namespaces and believe this might
> be an useful change even as we rework our pts/device namespace approach.
> 
> ---
> 
> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [PATCH]: Factor out PTY index allocation
> 
> Factor out the code used to allocate/free a pts index into new interfaces,
> devpts_new_index() and devpts_kill_index().  This localizes the external
> data structures used in managing the pts indices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> ---
>  drivers/char/tty_io.c     |   40 ++++++----------------------------------
>  fs/devpts/inode.c         |   42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/devpts_fs.h |    4 ++++
>  3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
[...]
> Index: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2/drivers/char/tty_io.c
> ===================================================================
> --- 2.6.25-rc8-mm2.orig/drivers/char/tty_io.c 2008-04-16 09:51:11.000000000 
> -0700
> +++ 2.6.25-rc8-mm2/drivers/char/tty_io.c      2008-04-16 09:51:15.000000000 
> -0700
> @@ -137,9 +136,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(tty_mutex);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_UNIX98_PTYS
>  extern struct tty_driver *ptm_driver;        /* Unix98 pty masters; for 
> /dev/ptmx */
> -extern int pty_limit;                        /* Config limit on Unix98 ptys 
> */
> -static DEFINE_IDR(allocated_ptys);
> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(allocated_ptys_lock);
[...]
> Index: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2/fs/devpts/inode.c
> ===================================================================
> --- 2.6.25-rc8-mm2.orig/fs/devpts/inode.c     2008-02-27 15:17:59.000000000 
> -0800
> +++ 2.6.25-rc8-mm2/fs/devpts/inode.c  2008-04-16 09:51:15.000000000 -0700
> @@ -26,6 +27,10 @@
>  
>  #define DEVPTS_DEFAULT_MODE 0600
>  
> +extern int pty_limit;                        /* Config limit on Unix98 ptys 
> */
> +static DEFINE_IDR(allocated_ptys);
> +static DECLARE_MUTEX(allocated_ptys_lock);

Ugh, why mutex->semaphore conversion?
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to