On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 07:44:59AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > . echo "LONG XX" > /proc/self/task/<my_tid>/next_id > next object to be created will have an id set to XX > . echo "LONG<n> X0 ... X<n-1>" > /proc/self/task/<my_tid>/next_id > next object to be created will have its ids set to XX0, ... X<n-1> > This is particularly useful for processes that may have several ids if > they belong to nested namespaces.
Can we answer the following questions before merging this patch: a) should mainline kernel have checkpoint/restart feature at all b) if yes, should it be done from kernel- or userspace? Until agreement will be "yes/from userspace" such patches don't make sense in mainline. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
