Hi Nishimura-san, Thanks good point out.
>> +#include <linux/res_counter.h> > I don't think it's needed. > Or, are you planning to implement this feature by using res_counter? your are right. my early version use res_counter, but it isn't used currently. >> + spin_lock(&taskcg->lock); >> + if (max_tasks < taskcg->nr_tasks) >> + return -EBUSY; > need spin_unlock(). Yes, of cource. I'll fix it. Thanks! _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
