On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 19:09 -0700, Paul Menage wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Matt Helsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > True, though I don't think it's as simple as just enabling lockdep. > > My > > understanding is you won't be able to determine if locks could ever be > > taken out of order unless all of the cgroup systems are enabled and they > > are all in the same cgroup hierarchy. > > I wonder how hard it would be to extend lockdep to give a "signature" > of locking operations from point A to point B? Then you could just > compare a new subsystem with all existing subsystems without actually > running with it.
something like: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/22/308 ? _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
