Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Sorry, Greg is walking out the door in 30 minutes for a much needed week
>> long vacation and can't look into this right now :(
>>
>> I'll be able to review it next weekend, sorry for the delay.
> 
> Any progress in reviewing these changes, and seeing if you can stand
> to merge them?

Greg, please disregard my earlier NACKs and commit the patches if you're
okay with them.  I'm working on cleaning it up but I don't think I'll be
able to make it in time for merge window and as Eric said getting the
functionality in place is more important at this point as it doesn't
affect user visible interface.

Eric, with the multiple superblocks, sysfs now uses inode from the
default sysfs_sb with dentries from other sb's.  Is this okay?  Are
there any other filesystems which do this?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to